Patent Examples Such As " E commerce Patent " Can Be Legally Complex. That's Why Our Patent Lawyers Are Ready To Help With:

  • Patent Pending
  • Existing Patents
  • Biology Patent

  • Need Patent Help? Contact Our Lawyers!

    Name:
    Patent Topic:
    Email:

       Patent Topics
  • Patent Help Terms


  • Patent Questions


  • Patent Steps


  • Types of Patents


  • Similar Patent Search


  • Protect Your Idea


  • Patent Progress


  • Patent Forms


  • Patent Links


  • Patent News


  • U.S. and Australian Patent Offices Launch Pilot Project


  • SenSage Awarded Patent For Event Data Management Technology


  • Competitive Technologies Announces Notice Of Allowance For Second Patent


  • More Patent Topics >

    Patent Topics Our Firm Can Help With
    • Patent License
    • Biology Patent
    • Intellectual Properties
    • Databases Patent
    • Design
    • Register Patent
    • TV Signal Patent
    • Patent Technology
    • Title of Invention
    • Patent Treaty


    Do you need legal Patent help? Contact our Patent Lawyers today!

     

    Related Patent News

    New Product Idea
    < Back to Previous Page

    USPTO Requesting More Timely and Useful Information From Patent Applicants


    As part of its ongoing efforts to promote investment in innovation and spur economic growth, the Department of Commerce's U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) today announced a new proposal that would streamline and improve the patent application review process. The new proposal would encourage patent applicants to provide the USPTO the most relevant information related to their inventions in the early stages of the review process.

    “Clear disclosure upfront by applicants helps examiners more quickly make the correct decision about whether a claimed invention deserves a patent,” noted Jon Dudas, under secretary of commerce for intellectual property. “Clear, forthright disclosure benefits all, because the public – including potential investors - wants to know that a patent application has been thoroughly reviewed, applying the best data available.”

    Patent applicants and their attorneys or agents currently have an obligation to inform USPTO's patent examiners of all information known to be material to patentability of the invention claimed by the applicant. Applicants list information for the examiner to consider in a communication called an Information Disclosure Statement (IDS).

    The USPTO has observed that applicants sometimes provide information in a way that hinders rather than helps timely, accurate examination. For example, some applicants send a very large number of documents to the examiner, without identifying why they have been submitted, thus tending to obscure the most relevant information. Additionally, some applicants send very long documents without pointing out what part of the document makes it relevant to the claimed invention. Sometimes applicants delay sending key information to the examiner. These practices make it extremely difficult for the patent examiner to find and properly consider the most relevant information in the limited time available for examination of an application.

    The USPTO's proposed rule change is designed to encourage early submission of relevant information, and to discourage submission of information that is unimportant or does not add something new for the examiner to consider. With the proposed changes, patent examiners would not have to review documents that do not directly relate to the claimed invention, or that duplicate other information already submitted.

    Proposal Specifics

    To encourage submission of relevant information to the patent examiner promptly and in a way that brings the most important information to the attention of the examiner, the USPTO is proposing to eliminate all fees associated with submitting an IDS. Under the proposal, applicants in most cases would be permitted to send up to twenty documents without additional explanation, if these documents are provided to the USPTO before the examiner sends a first communication to the applicant.

    Were an applicant to submit more than twenty documents, or wait until after the patent examiner's first communication has been sent, the applicant would face increasing requirements to provide more detailed information about the documents and how they relate to the claimed invention. Applicants could be required to point out what part of the document makes it important, to identify specific claims to which a document applies, to clarify how a document adds new information not already considered by the examiner, or explain why the claims are patentable in light of the information provided.

    Under the proposal, applicants would still be able to send in as many documents as they choose. However, there would be more stringent requirements for those choosing to submit large numbers of documents or very long documents.

    For further information see www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/notices/71fr38808.pdf">http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/sol/notices/71fr38808.pdf .

    Call Our Toll Free: (888) 275-2757 or Contact Us Online For a No-Obligation Consultation

    Did You Know?

    There is a time limit on patent protection.

    For applications filed on or after June 8, 1995, utility and plant patents are granted for a term which begins with the date of the grant and usually ends 20 years from the date you first applied for the patent subject to the payment of appropriate maintenance fees. Design patents last 14 years from the date you are granted the patent. Note: Patents in force on June 8 and patents issued thereafter on applications filed prior to June 8, 1995 automatically have a term that is the greater of the twenty year term discussed above or seventeen years from the patent grant.

    Contact our Patent Professionals to ensure you complete the patent filing process correctly or for violation of your patent rights.